Score Intelligence
Pollution×35% + Reduction×25% + Investment×20% + Transparency×10% + Community×10%
Pollution
×35%
Reduction
×25%
Investment
×20%
Transparency
×10%
Community
×10%
EcoIQ Total
56.4
5-Year EcoIQ Trend
60-month historical · composite score
85+ Restorative
70–84 Transition
55–69 Improving
40–54 High Impact
<40 Polluter
Emissions Intelligence
Pollution intensity index · Methane emissions profile · 24-month window
MODELLED
Pollution Intensity Index (lower = cleaner)
Methane Emissions Profile (relative units)
Multi-Pillar Intelligence
All 5 ESG pillars · 60-month trajectory · weighted composite
LIVE DATA
57
Pollution
56
Reduction
54
Investment
57
Transparency
57
Community
Score Explainability Engine
Per-pillar drivers · penalties · disclosure gaps · risk signals · 12-month trend
ANALYTICAL
57
Pollution
→
unknown
56
Reduction
→
unknown
54
Investment
→
unknown
57
Transparency
→
unknown
57
Community
→
unknown
Pollution Footprint
Weight ×35%
· 1 penalty
· 2 gaps
57
⚠ Penalties
Pollution Footprint 57/100 — below Clean Transition threshold (60)
Score below 60 indicates pollution intensity above the sector median. Clean Transition threshold requires demonstrated monitoring, reduction plans, and third-party verification.
high
-8.0pts
EcoIQ scoring
95%
❓ Missing Disclosures
Scope 1+2 emissions not independently verified via satellite
No GHGSat or Sentinel-5P satellite verification in evidence base. Satellite data provides tamper-evident, facility-level verification required for MSCI ESG Tier 1 environmental data quality rating.
high
-4.0pts
Evidence base
88%
No government environmental permit or compliance report
Regulatory permits and state environmental inspection reports are the primary legal verification instrument for emissions levels in Kazakhstan and CIS markets.
medium
-3.0pts
Evidence base
80%
Reduction Progress
Weight ×25%
· 1 penalty
· 1 gap
56
⚠ Penalties
Reduction Progress 56/100 — below transition benchmark
Score reflects limited quantified year-on-year reduction progress. Transition Leaders require independently verified absolute reduction targets with defined interim milestones.
high
-7.0pts
EcoIQ scoring
93%
❓ Missing Disclosures
Science Based Targets (SBTi) commitment not found
No SBTi 1.5°C-aligned commitment detected in evidence base. SBTi validation is required for MSCI ESG "AA" rating and is a standard screen in sustainable investment mandates. Without it, absolute targ…
high
-5.0pts
Evidence base
82%
Investment
Weight ×20%
· 1 penalty
· 1 gap
54
⚠ Penalties
Investment pillar 54/100 — below sector benchmark (60)
Investment level below sector median suggests environmental capex does not keep pace with the company's pollution intensity or revenue scale.
high
-6.0pts
EcoIQ scoring
90%
❓ Missing Disclosures
Annual revenue not disclosed — investment ratio cannot be computed
Without revenue data, environmental capex as % of revenue — a key MSCI ESG and Bloomberg ESG metric — cannot be verified.
medium
-3.0pts
Company data
85%
🔴 Risk Signals
Investment score not supported by project-level evidence
Investment pillar score is above 50 but no project-level investment data is recorded in the EcoIQ evidence base. Score may rely on unverified claims.
medium
Data quality check
75%
Transparency
Weight ×10%
· 2 penalties
· 1 gap
57
⚠ Penalties
No evidence documents in the EcoIQ evidence base
Transparency score cannot be substantiated without disclosure documents. Companies with zero documented evidence receive a maximum score of 15/100 in the Transparency pillar.
critical
-15.0pts
Evidence base
99%
Transparency score 57/100 — insufficient public disclosure depth
Score below 60 indicates disclosure gaps that prevent institutional investors from conducting full ESG due diligence under MSCI, TCFD, or GRI Standards.
medium
-5.0pts
EcoIQ scoring
88%
❓ Missing Disclosures
No GRI/TCFD/CDP-aligned report detected
Annual sustainability report aligned to GRI Standards, TCFD framework, or CDP questionnaire is required for MSCI ESG rating category A/AA. Its absence is the single largest driver of below-60 Transpa…
high
-6.0pts
Evidence base
85%
Community Impact
Weight ×10%
· 1 penalty
· 2 gaps
57
⚠ Penalties
Community Impact 57/100 — below transition benchmark
Transition Leaders require evidence of measurable community health outcomes (air quality, health data) and documented community engagement processes.
medium
-4.0pts
EcoIQ scoring
87%
❓ Missing Disclosures
No household or community beneficiary data recorded
Community Impact cannot be quantified without beneficiary data. Open-data air quality sensor networks, community health surveys, and documented stakeholder engagement are standard evidence inputs.
high
-6.0pts
Evidence base
88%
No direct community-benefit projects detected
No coal-stove replacement, tree planting, water clean-up, or community filter projects found. These project types are the primary evidence-based drivers of Community Impact scoring.
medium
-4.0pts
Project analysis
80%
Benchmark — Other Sector
Top 6 by EcoIQ · 194 total in sector
#1
Microsoft
82.5
#2
Apple
78.6
#3
Alphabet / Google
77.7
#4
NVIDIA
73.6
#5
Unilever
71.7
#6
BlackRock
69.0
CO₂ Avoided Intelligence
0
tonnes CO₂/yr avoided
(completed + active)
(completed + active)
—
Completed projects
—
Active (+ planned)
No CO₂ reduction data recorded for projects yet.
Environmental Projects
No projects recorded yet.
Evidence & Verification
No evidence documents uploaded yet.
ESG Disclosure Completeness
0% of 7 evidence categories
0%
Complete
✗
Audit Report
✗
Government Report
✗
Satellite
✗
Engineering Audit
✗
Photo
✗
Invoice
✗
Permit
UN SDG Alignment
0 of 17 active
1
No Poverty
2
Zero Hunger
3
Good Health
4
Quality Education
5
Gender Equality
6
Clean Water
7
Clean Energy
8
Decent Work
9
Industry & Innovation
10
Reduced Inequalities
11
Sustainable Cities
12
Responsible Consumption
13
Climate Action
14
Life Below Water
15
Life on Land
16
Peace & Justice
17
Partnerships
SDG alignment inferred from project types. Greyscale = not directly covered.
AI Recommendation Engine
Demo · Phase 4
Deploy Continuous Emissions Monitoring (CEMS)
Critical
📈 Pollution Footprint +8–15 pts
No real-time stack monitoring found in the evidence base. CEMS provides tamper-evident, near-real-time telemetry that satisfies both Kazakhstan Environmental Code (2022) Tier-1 requirements and MSCI ESG data quality thresholds.
SDG 9SDG 11SDG 13
Set a Science-Based Emissions Reduction Target (SBTi)
High
📈 Reduction Progress +10–18 pts
No independently verified GHG pathway detected. An SBTi 1.5 °C-aligned commitment unlocks green bond eligibility, improves Bloomberg ESG score inputs, and signals credibility to institutional investors applying Paris-aligned screening.
SDG 13SDG 17
Increase Environmental Capex to ≥1% of Annual Revenue
High
📈 Investment pillar +12–20 pts
Current clean investment appears below the sector median for Other. The 1% annual revenue threshold is the MSCI ESG benchmark used to distinguish "credible commitment" from "token compliance" in heavy-industry ratings.
SDG 9SDG 13
Publish Annual GRI/TCFD-Aligned Sustainability Report
Medium
📈 Transparency +15–25 pts
No GRI Standards, TCFD framework, or CDP disclosure found. Annual third-party assured reporting is now expected of all Tier-1 permitted emitters under Kazakhstan's Environmental Code revision (2022), and required for S&P 500 supply-chain ESG audits.
SDG 16SDG 17