Score Intelligence
Pollution×35% + Reduction×25% + Investment×20% + Transparency×10% + Community×10%
Pollution
×35%
Reduction
×25%
Investment
×20%
Transparency
×10%
Community
×10%
EcoIQ Total
34.5
5-Year EcoIQ Trend
60-month historical · composite score
85+ Restorative
70–84 Transition
55–69 Improving
40–54 High Impact
<40 Polluter
Emissions Intelligence
Pollution intensity index · Methane emissions profile · 24-month window
MODELLED
Pollution Intensity Index (lower = cleaner)
Methane Emissions Profile (relative units)
Multi-Pillar Intelligence
All 5 ESG pillars · 60-month trajectory · weighted composite
LIVE DATA
34
Pollution
35
Reduction
32
Investment
36
Transparency
35
Community
Score Explainability Engine
Per-pillar drivers · penalties · disclosure gaps · risk signals · 12-month trend
ANALYTICAL
34
Pollution
→
unknown
35
Reduction
→
unknown
32
Investment
→
unknown
36
Transparency
→
unknown
35
Community
→
unknown
Pollution Footprint
Weight ×35%
· 1 penalty
· 2 gaps
34
⚠ Penalties
Pollution Footprint 34/100 — Major Polluter tier
Score below 40 indicates absolute emissions far exceed sector-transition benchmarks. Institutional investors using MSCI ESG or Bloomberg ESG frameworks typically flag companies below this threshold.
critical
-15.0pts
EcoIQ scoring
98%
❓ Missing Disclosures
Scope 1+2 emissions not independently verified via satellite
No GHGSat or Sentinel-5P satellite verification in evidence base. Satellite data provides tamper-evident, facility-level verification required for MSCI ESG Tier 1 environmental data quality rating.
high
-4.0pts
Evidence base
88%
No government environmental permit or compliance report
Regulatory permits and state environmental inspection reports are the primary legal verification instrument for emissions levels in Kazakhstan and CIS markets.
medium
-3.0pts
Evidence base
80%
🔴 Risk Signals
No methane monitoring data — elevated regulatory risk
Oil, gas, and mining operations are subject to Kazakhstan's 2022 Environmental Code methane reporting requirements (Art. 169). Absence of LDAR or continuous monitoring creates compliance exposure.
medium
Regulatory framework
78%
Reduction Progress
Weight ×25%
· 1 penalty
· 1 gap
35
⚠ Penalties
Reduction Progress 35/100 — no credible decarbonisation pathway
Score below 40 indicates absence of measurable, time-bound emission reduction commitments. Under MSCI ESG methodology, this triggers a company-level ESG controversy flag.
critical
-12.0pts
EcoIQ scoring
97%
❓ Missing Disclosures
Science Based Targets (SBTi) commitment not found
No SBTi 1.5°C-aligned commitment detected in evidence base. SBTi validation is required for MSCI ESG "AA" rating and is a standard screen in sustainable investment mandates. Without it, absolute targ…
high
-5.0pts
Evidence base
82%
Investment
Weight ×20%
· 1 penalty
· 1 gap
32
⚠ Penalties
Investment pillar 32/100 — environmental capex below critical threshold
Score implies clean investment well below the 0.5% of estimated revenue threshold. MSCI ESG methodology classifies companies below this threshold as "Low ESG Commitment" regardless of other disclosur…
critical
-10.0pts
EcoIQ scoring
96%
❓ Missing Disclosures
Annual revenue not disclosed — investment ratio cannot be computed
Without revenue data, environmental capex as % of revenue — a key MSCI ESG and Bloomberg ESG metric — cannot be verified.
medium
-3.0pts
Company data
85%
Transparency
Weight ×10%
· 2 penalties
· 1 gap
36
⚠ Penalties
No evidence documents in the EcoIQ evidence base
Transparency score cannot be substantiated without disclosure documents. Companies with zero documented evidence receive a maximum score of 15/100 in the Transparency pillar.
critical
-15.0pts
Evidence base
99%
Transparency score 36/100 — insufficient public disclosure depth
Score below 60 indicates disclosure gaps that prevent institutional investors from conducting full ESG due diligence under MSCI, TCFD, or GRI Standards.
medium
-5.0pts
EcoIQ scoring
88%
❓ Missing Disclosures
No GRI/TCFD/CDP-aligned report detected
Annual sustainability report aligned to GRI Standards, TCFD framework, or CDP questionnaire is required for MSCI ESG rating category A/AA. Its absence is the single largest driver of below-60 Transpa…
high
-6.0pts
Evidence base
85%
Community Impact
Weight ×10%
· 1 penalty
· 2 gaps
35
⚠ Penalties
Community Impact 35/100 — limited measurable community benefit
Score below 40 indicates absence of documented community-level impact. For industrial operators near populated areas, this represents a significant social licence risk.
high
-8.0pts
EcoIQ scoring
93%
❓ Missing Disclosures
No household or community beneficiary data recorded
Community Impact cannot be quantified without beneficiary data. Open-data air quality sensor networks, community health surveys, and documented stakeholder engagement are standard evidence inputs.
high
-6.0pts
Evidence base
88%
No direct community-benefit projects detected
No coal-stove replacement, tree planting, water clean-up, or community filter projects found. These project types are the primary evidence-based drivers of Community Impact scoring.
medium
-4.0pts
Project analysis
80%
🔴 Risk Signals
Low community engagement score for high-impact industrial sector
Mining operations near populated areas require community liaison, health monitoring, and regular stakeholder reporting. Absence creates social licence risk and potential regulatory exposure.
medium
Sector analysis
76%
Benchmark — Mining Sector
Top 6 by EcoIQ · 42 total in sector
#1
Newmont
49.7
#2
Barrick Gold
46.7
#3
Fresnillo
46.2
#4
Anglo American
45.9
#5
BHP
45.8
#6
Kazatomprom
44.5
CO₂ Avoided Intelligence
0
tonnes CO₂/yr avoided
(completed + active)
(completed + active)
—
Completed projects
—
Active (+ planned)
No CO₂ reduction data recorded for projects yet.
Environmental Projects
No projects recorded yet.
Evidence & Verification
No evidence documents uploaded yet.
ESG Disclosure Completeness
0% of 7 evidence categories
0%
Complete
✗
Audit Report
✗
Government Report
✗
Satellite
✗
Engineering Audit
✗
Photo
✗
Invoice
✗
Permit
UN SDG Alignment
0 of 17 active
1
No Poverty
2
Zero Hunger
3
Good Health
4
Quality Education
5
Gender Equality
6
Clean Water
7
Clean Energy
8
Decent Work
9
Industry & Innovation
10
Reduced Inequalities
11
Sustainable Cities
12
Responsible Consumption
13
Climate Action
14
Life Below Water
15
Life on Land
16
Peace & Justice
17
Partnerships
SDG alignment inferred from project types. Greyscale = not directly covered.
AI Recommendation Engine
Demo · Phase 4
Deploy Continuous Emissions Monitoring (CEMS)
Critical
📈 Pollution Footprint +8–15 pts
No real-time stack monitoring found in the evidence base. CEMS provides tamper-evident, near-real-time telemetry that satisfies both Kazakhstan Environmental Code (2022) Tier-1 requirements and MSCI ESG data quality thresholds.
SDG 9SDG 11SDG 13
Set a Science-Based Emissions Reduction Target (SBTi)
High
📈 Reduction Progress +10–18 pts
No independently verified GHG pathway detected. An SBTi 1.5 °C-aligned commitment unlocks green bond eligibility, improves Bloomberg ESG score inputs, and signals credibility to institutional investors applying Paris-aligned screening.
SDG 13SDG 17
Increase Environmental Capex to ≥1% of Annual Revenue
High
📈 Investment pillar +12–20 pts
Current clean investment appears below the sector median for Mining. The 1% annual revenue threshold is the MSCI ESG benchmark used to distinguish "credible commitment" from "token compliance" in heavy-industry ratings.
SDG 9SDG 13
Publish Annual GRI/TCFD-Aligned Sustainability Report
Medium
📈 Transparency +15–25 pts
No GRI Standards, TCFD framework, or CDP disclosure found. Annual third-party assured reporting is now expected of all Tier-1 permitted emitters under Kazakhstan's Environmental Code revision (2022), and required for S&P 500 supply-chain ESG audits.
SDG 16SDG 17